Outcomes
What changed for the learners who use NexGen Mastery, measured from their own attempts and readiness examinations — not from a survey, a testimonial, or a pass rate we have no way to verify.
Publishing when 5 learners qualify.
A median over a handful of people is noise, and a small enough group lets a classmate guess who moved
the number. Until then, we do not estimate it.
Three measures, each from the learner's own record
- Practice score change — for each learner with at least 20 first-attempt items, the share of marks earned on the chronologically later half of their items minus the earlier half; the median across learners is published.
- Readiness-examination change — for learners who have completed at least 2 readiness examinations, the ability estimate (θ̂, on the bank's own logit scale) on their most recent sitting minus their first; the median is published.
- Rationale ratings — every practice rationale ends with “Was this rationale helpful?”; the share of answers that were yes is published, never per item or per learner.
Limitations
- These are not equated to, and do not predict, any licensure or certification exam result. “Score change” compares a learner's own early and late practice-item performance; it is not a pre/post-test on the same instrument.
- Every figure is withheld, not estimated, until at least 5 learners qualify for it — both because a median over a handful of people is noise, and because a small enough group lets a classmate guess who moved the number.
- Learners who stop practicing after a strong start, or who only ever answer a handful of items, are excluded from score change by the same item-count threshold that would exclude anyone with too little signal — this is not a survivorship filter applied after the fact.
- No testimonials, no marketing pass-rate claim, and no number here is hand-typed; every one is computed from the attempts and readiness-session tables at publish time.